<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: stretching space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.georgeclarke.co.uk/top-tips/stretching-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.georgeclarke.co.uk</link>
	<description>Architect and TV presenter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:18:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monika</title>
		<link>http://www.georgeclarke.co.uk/top-tips/stretching-space/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Monika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgeclarke.co.uk/?page_id=631#comment-556</guid>
		<description>&quot;dropped by as much as a foot and replaced with a concrete floor&quot; - do you have some pointers to how exactly this is done on Victorian/ Edwardian properties? Does damp not penetrate into the walls then instead?
I&#039;m a huge fan of UFH and have been looking for a house where I can actually install it, but keep seeing wooden subfloors, where UFH would not be as effiecient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;dropped by as much as a foot and replaced with a concrete floor&#8221; &#8211; do you have some pointers to how exactly this is done on Victorian/ Edwardian properties? Does damp not penetrate into the walls then instead?<br />
I&#8217;m a huge fan of UFH and have been looking for a house where I can actually install it, but keep seeing wooden subfloors, where UFH would not be as effiecient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
